62 Comments
User's avatar
Kenneth J Hinnenkamp's avatar

Virology is pseudoscience. If you haven't come to that conclusion, you will make wrong choices.

M J Kelly's avatar

Once you know, you know.

Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

Scientists failed to investigate how toxic chemicals like arsenic (lead arsenate) and DDT induced the same neurological symptoms as alleged Polio "infections" and instead pursued a viral/contagion cause. So much like numerous other diseases like Measles, and like SMON in Japan in the latter part of the 20th Century.

And the John Franklin Enders 1954 experiment which pioneered the cell culture method which is still used as the basis of "proof" for the presence of a virus in a fluid or other cellular extract from a sick individual is the epitome of bad science, evidenced by the experiment's very own control (something neglected since the first one) called into question the notion that this procedure in any way proved the presence of a virus.

The fact that both of those historical facts are covered up by the education system and all other alleged information sources of this society constitutes the crime of all time against sound science. I was certainly not taught any of that in my high school biology class, at one of New York's three science-focused high schools (all highly rated among US high schools), The Bronx High School of Science.

Ellasquared's avatar

Bottom line. People and animals get sick (display symptoms of poisoning) when they're exposed to chemicals and other toxins (poisons), environmentally or jabbed into their bodies "for their health". They're not getting sick from "nature" because if that were true we would not be here as a species. And if these scary microbes are in nature, we have been exposed 1 million trillion times, we are exposed every day. if it's all contagion, there wouldn't be a nursing profession because historically nurses cared for the sick so it would be a very dangerous career choice.

Ollie's avatar

Right! As a species we would've been wiped out a long long time ago.

Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

I also wanted to say, FABULOUS, FANTASTIC JOB, Mike!! You packed a lot of information and excellent detailed analysis into this presentation. The information has been out there, but you put it all together in a very succinct straight forward manner. I totally agree, everyone should watch this. I plan on sharing it as widely as possible.

Neil Hanson's avatar

Can't, it's behind a chickenshit PAYWALL!

Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

Last i looked, part 3 is here on this page, for free.

patbuckley's avatar

children instinctively know that being injected is not good. Parents have been hoodwinked into thinking they are caring for their children to inject them. Time to wake up. Injecting babies within hours of life is just pure evil.

Chelseabern's avatar

After watching this any fully fledged virologist should move to another field of investigation like unicornology . At least they be able to show something that resembles their thoughts, as opposed to the total bullshit and lies they present at present!!

Ellasquared's avatar

Science is the observation of our natural world. Let's start with smallpox. People noticed that Milkmaids did not get symptoms of smallpox and it was assumed it was because they were exposed to cowpox. And we all heard that and believed it.Let's break this down - if it's true, one of two things happened. Either they were milking sick cows with obvious pox on their udders (unlikely but if this was true, what happened to the milk? Did they give that to people? Did those people become sick and die or did they have no symptoms and/or become immune?) or they milked healthy cows. In either case, they had natural exposure and then touched their faces and were exposed to the natural routes of entry of the mucous membranes (mouth, nose, eyes) but they never developed symptoms. So the brilliant observers of the day said aha! To mimic this, let's make a crude opening in the arm of a person, which is a violation of our largest protection, take infected pus and smear it in there. And those first recipients ultimately died and it wasn't just because it wasn't a sterile needle. These experiments have been repeated with military where they take the infected sputum of sick soldiers and put it into the mouths and nose of Healthy soldiers and they never get sick. These little facts are not shared with the general population But most don't stop to think at all let alone read. Now go to the Mayo Clinic website and read about why tattoos are dangerous (because they break the natural skin barrier which could lead to infection) and then go over to their page on vaccines where they do not mention not only breaking the first layer or so of skin But that vaccines drive a needle deep through the first layers of skin all the way into the muscle there's no mention of the risk of breaking the skin barrier. Sepsis occurs in many recently vaccinated. Finally how were generations convinced to stab their precious children with needles, which goes against every parental instinct to protect, and even watch and/or laugh at children and animals who object and fight to get away from the assault, and believe it to be a necessary evil for their "health"

Jane's avatar

Thank you .This was very interesting documentary about the whole fairy story of viruses and vaccines began . I will look for the other parts 🙏💖

Rider's avatar

Effective pesentation, thank you. Rotating among the various expert commentators, each explaining how and why virology has been falsified is very good.

The one improvement I'd try to incorporate is a better explanation of the meaning of Stefan Lanka's remarks. Viewers won't understand what he means, so if one could insert audio-captioned segments in Dr. lanka's commentary, explaining more clearly what he means, that would make that particular presentation easier for viewers to grasp. The explanations of the other scientists are more clear. Stefan Lanka's first language, of course, is German. This is not a critique of Stefan Lanka.

Ellasquared's avatar

Bobby Kennedy needs to hear this series. It's incredibly frustrating that he promotes vaccines on any level in his supposed effort to awaken people and "fix" these concoctions by "improving" the ingredients or the timing or the number of shots given or whatever other "reason" they choose to blame that "if only" we could fix it, these things would still be great –because there is no role for vaccines in any situation. They are only capable of harm, physical, intellectual and spiritual. Something came out recently that all of the people who succumbed to the c🤪vid jab scam destroyed their pineal glands in addition to the significant numbers of other sudden/unexpected physical ailments and deaths we are seeing

Jeffrey Strahl's avatar

RFK Jr knows all that. He's been presented this information a bunch of times, and has responded by covering it up for several years.

includeMeOut's avatar

RFK was confronted a few years ago by Eric Coppolino with the missing virus issue ( specifically the work of Christine Massey and her FOIA requests for viral isolation) and he basically punted. Same story with CHD.

Ellasquared's avatar

Thank you for sharing that! Yes it's tiring hearing people say "well he has to comply on some level" and I used to buy that line too because you have to get an "in" with true believers. It's one thing to play the game to get their ear, it's another thing entirely to go along with any part of the lie. it's not hard to do, you don't have to come out full force and say the truth that vaccines are nothing but poison but you should not be promoting them as necessary or beneficial on any level, in any situation, individual, community or historical perspective. We need to shift the narrative/question from "are they safe and effective" to "are they beneficial and/or necessary" and since they are 100% unnecessary and offer zero benefit, there is no need to "study" or "improve" these things.

Kaylene Emery's avatar

Thanks for taking the time. Maybe the problem is that you love Bobby and the progress he’s made ?

I mean what if this man you love and respect is absolutely nothing like you believe him to be ?

I’m in Aus and what would I know .But from what you write just now, you are saying that he couldn’t possibly do something so diabolical as know the truth and choose to lie . Regardless of harm to others .

You personally can’t convince of this in BK.

What I’m trying to convey is that this may say more about you…than him.

Anon E. Mousse's avatar

I would bet the farm that RFK Jr. is all over this.

Kaylene Emery's avatar

What makes you imagine that he ( BK ) doesn’t know?

Serious question.

Ellasquared's avatar

Because when you know the truth about vaccines, you would never ever promote them on any level so the fact that he was out there promoting MMR because horror there was a supposed measles outbreak...

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 1, 2025
Comment deleted
Kaylene Emery's avatar

Isn’t your reply based on what you , a person of sound morals /mind would or would not do ? In short , projection ?

What if there are more than the two options you site ?

Ellasquared's avatar

When you know the truth about vaccines which she seems to understand, you would never promote them on any level like he was doing with the measles outbreak. In fact you don't fear with these infections and you know that the body is designed to overcome these mile challenge challenges for the greater purpose of proper education of the Very brilliant immune system which doesn't need help from highly profitable liability free pHARMaceutical injections. Vaccine theory is the biggest lie ever told. They are 100% unnecessary and have zero benefit on any level, in any individual, community or historical perspective. They can't be made better by changing the ingredients or the schedule or the timing or any other "reason" to "fix" an unnecessary, non-beneficial and only harmful practice.

Falken's avatar

Thanks for sharing this crucial information! See also: https://falkentheater.substack.com/p/the-inconvenient-truth-about-an-inconvenient

Anon E. Mousse's avatar

Bits and pieces of this information have been presented elsewhere but there are core concepts in what we think of as scientific practice that are skewered here. First, why has there not been advancement in viral isolation since the mid-20th century? Second, if a key feature of scientific reliability is replicability, does it count when scientists keep replicating bad practices? That's what it sounds like is going on with virology. So I will add that to my pantry of critical analysis tools.

Are these discussions death knells for some scientists? I remember reading with some fascination the memoir of Kary Mullis, Dancing Naked in the Mind Field. I later learned that Mullis was kicked to the curb by the scientific community because he challenged HIV 'science'. Is that what can be expected if other scientists raise issues? Nobody willing to go the E pur si muove route any more?

Vanessa Gray's avatar

My sister got polio in the early 1960s after having the polio vaccine. She was 9 years old. I am the only person in the world who claims she got polio from the vaccine. Explains her learning difficulties as well. I now believe that all "infectious disease" is infact poisoning. Does anyone know the truth behind leprosy out of interest?

Luisa Grass blanco's avatar

Thank you for saying the truth!