It's Time to End The Tragically Misguided Theory of SARS-CoV-2

More than two years now since the claimed discovery of a new pathogenetic virus SARS-CoV-2, which purportedly caused a disease called “covid,” supposedly having now resulted in the deaths of over one million people, the theory that such a virus actually ever existed has become untenable to anyone with common sense. 

Drip by drip, scientific results and analyses have come in, and it’s now known that to have made the case for this theorized virus, inconclusive scientific conclusions were proclaimed as fact, crucial experimental steps consistently skipped, inconvenient scientific results ignored, logic disregarded, language re-defined, and wide-scale statistical fraud carried out.

When even a short survey of what we now know is considered, it becomes clear that no such virus was ever found, and that to properly escape from the spiraling disaster this delusion spun upon the world, the theory itself must be thrown out as soon as humanly possible. 

1. From the very start of the supposed crisis in Wuhan 2019, it was never established that any patients were sick due to a new and distinct disease. The original symptoms of the patients in Wuhan said to be the first victims of covid were “a cough and a fever.” Since when are a cough and a fever the clear symptoms of a new disease?¹

2. Of the original three patients believed to have the new disease covid, two of them recovered after three days from their cough and fever on their own. The third was placed on a ventilator due to a concern that he had “SARS.”²  He died. It was later discovered that 88% of patients placed on ventilators die, likely from the ventilation process itself, compared to 20% of similarly ill patients not placed on ventilators.³ So it appears the very first “covid” death was a death of misdiagnosis followed by mistreatment.

3. Furious attempts were then made in Wuhan to ascribe the original patients’ cough and fever to a new virus by studying and attempting to find a new virus in their fluids. Yet a virus was never isolated from these fluids. To repeat: no new disease-causing particles were ever isolated from these sick patients’ bodily fluids.⁴ Isolation was claimed, but not reflected anywhere in the methodology. It was later confirmed that no actual isolation occurred.⁵

4. To date, after billions of research dollars have been spent, there has been no successful isolation of the claimed new virus. Instead, the word “isolate” has been redefined to mean “mixture.” One can buy “SARS-CoV-2 isolate” but one is only buying a mixture of patient bodily fluids mixed with animal cells, with no proof that such a mixture contains “the virus.”⁶⁷

5. When scientists examined the electron micrographs from cell culture that had been mixed with the fluids of sick patients believed to be infected with a new virus, they claimed they could see “SARS-CoV-2” but what was seen on the photographs was indistinguishable from other small particles commonly seen in the human body,⁸ and at times did not even have the shape said to be “SARS-CoV-2” e.g. there were no spikes on the circles.⁹ Numerous biologists warned these virologists in printed publications that their claims of having pictured the virus were mistaken but there have been no public retractions.¹⁰ 

6. When scientists attempted to see if they could find replication of this theorized virus by placing fluids from a sick person believed to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 on human lung cells, where they believed the virus to replicate, they could not find replication of any virus on the cells.¹¹ ¹²

7. Though other scientists"succeeded" in seeing damaged cells after placing sick (said to have “covid”) patients' fluids on them, these fluids were combined with antibiotics which were also damaging to the cells, and no control experiments were run to rule this, or other factors, out.¹³

8. When scientists attempted to see if they could find replication of this theorized virus by placing tissue from a sick person believed to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 on other human cell lines, they could not find replicated virus on the cells.¹⁴ The only cell lines which the fluid-mixture of a sick person consistently damages in experiments is kidney cells, which is not surprising as the fluid-mixtures consistently contain kidney-toxic antibiotics.¹⁵

9. It was claimed that the virus spread through the air. However, when scientists attempted to find even partial strands of any rna supposedly associated with “the virus” (but findable even without “a virus”) in the air of hospital rooms from covid wards, they found even this was “undetectable or in very low concentrations".¹⁶

10. The genomic sequencing pointed to as the sequencing of the supposed new virus was made without ever having found/isolated a virus: the sequence compiled was a computer model of a potential sequence that might have been in the mixture, but could not be proven to exist in the mixture by this method.¹⁷¹⁸

11. Nevertheless, a test was designed and quickly put into use which the WHO and CDC claimed could determine whether or not people had “the virus” despite having been developed without an actual virus, without ever having been validated against a virus, and without ever having even been validated against a sample of sick patients.¹⁹ ²⁰

12. This “test” was shown time and again to spit out positive results in even the most absurd cases, including the testing of fruit, plants, chickens, goats, perfectly healthy people, and even people who had previously been marked “negative” only moments before.²¹²²

13. Nevertheless, the pcr “test” was put into widespread use to categorize “cases” of “covid,” though it was known the “test” had never been validated as a way of identifying “SARS-CoV-2”, and was being regularly run in ways (at ct levels) that would almost assuredly spit out positive responses on a regular basis, irrespective of whether the person had a theoretical virus inside them.²³

14. Obvious statistical fraud was then used to claim the rise of a widespread new disease, including the re-categorization of patients who would previously have been listed as having “the flu” being categorized instead as having “covid,” by the millions. Flu cases dropped by 98%, tens of millions by population count around the world, while “covid” cases increased by roughly the same number.²⁴

15. Statistics were further confused as hospitals were financially incentivized to claim their patients were covid cases, and were further incentivized to claim that deaths were due to covid rather than other causes, resulting in the now many well-known absurd claims that car accident victims had died due to covid.²⁵ 

16. In 94% of cases marked as deaths due to covid, the patients were already known to be suffering from other known deadly diseases. In the few remaining cases, the patients may simply have been suffering from undiagnosed diseases.²⁶

17. Autopsies were not performed on large numbers of “covid” victims to search for identifying markers of a new disease, though this was formerly a typical and logical step used to identify and understand the rise of a new disease.²⁷

18. When autopsies were performed on patients who were labelled as having died due to covid, they found nothing that could distinguish these bodies as being distinct from deaths due to other illnesses. E.g. one can not identify a corpse by any marker that would predict they died from “covid” vs. “pneumonia” or other previously known diseases.²⁸

19. There have since been many attempts to infect animals with the supposed “SARS-CoV-2” virus but not one experiment has successfully re-created the symptoms known as covid in these animals while showing no change in control animals.²⁹

20. In those animal experiments which showed a change in symptoms (albeit different than the symptoms of covid), the most cited study showed “a slight weight loss” and “bristled fur” in transgenic mice;³⁰ however even this change was likely to have been caused by the way the mice had been made transgenic. No control experiments were done to rule out any other factors.³¹ 

21. Mass medical experimentation was immediately called for by the WHO and CDC and was conducted on a wide-spread scale, based on the theory that patient illness was due to this new virus.  This experimentation was a universal failure.³²³³

22. If a new contagious virus were the cause of a new disease in 2020, mortality rates would have increased regardless of national borders; viruses wouldn’t stop at political borders. However mortality rates stopped at national borders. Mortality rates increased in areas that used experimental procedures to treat patients doctors thought were succumbing to a new disease, but higher mortality rates did not occur in places that refused to change their medical procedures or engage in medical experimentation.³⁴³⁵³⁶³⁷

23. Higher mortality rates in 2020 happened primarily in places where other dangerous factors had also been introduced - new vaccination schedules, new types of vaccinations, new forms and higher rates of air pollution, new more powerful forms of radiation, new forms of agricultural chemicals put into more frequent use, etc., where the chief symptom of the proclaimed new disease “covid” match not only previously known diseases but also matched the symptoms that would almost necessarily have increased  due to increased toxic influences.³⁸³⁹⁴⁰⁴¹⁴²⁴³⁴⁴⁴⁵

24. Death rates spiked in the first three months of the pandemic, when experimental procedures and the refusal to treat sick patients were at their highest levels, then just as quickly dropped as these procedures and experiments were phased out. If a deadly contagious virus were at work, death rates would have risen exponentially as “the virus” spread and “cases” continued to rise.⁴⁶

25. Treating sick people labelled with covid with “anti-viral” treatments showed little to no efficacy.⁴⁷

26. Treating sick people labelled with covid with treatments known to alleviate symptoms from non-viral origins (e.g. parasites, nutritional deficiencies) was shown in many cases to help alleviate those symptoms; e.g. Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine at proper doses, Vitamin D, Vitamin B, etc. If treating sick patients with pharmaceuticals and nutrients known to alleviate non-virally-caused symptoms alleviates those symptoms, then is it not likely they were suffering from non-viral problems?⁴⁸

27. Death rates went up in places with social procedures that treated sick people as having a virus, while they stayed flat in places where sick people were dealt with normally. In places where steps were taken to lockdown such as NYC, rates of sickness were far higher than in places which took few such lockdown steps, such as Sweden.⁴⁹ Were there a contagious virus, government scientists made clear they believed these lockdown steps would have showed a large positive effect; however, they did not.⁵⁰⁵¹⁵²⁵³⁵⁴

28. Masks also showed no positive impact on the incidence of disease, even though government viral modeling experts said they would.⁵⁵

29. We still don’t have a single confirmed case of asymptomatic transmission; studies of asymptomatic transmission showed no cases occurred whatsoever.⁵⁶

30. Though the vaccine should have, by its own makers’ accounts, lowered the death rate from the supposed disease “covid,” it has instead been linked to higher death rates among those marked as having covid, and higher death rates overall.⁵⁷⁵⁸⁵⁹

31. As shocking as it, historically, no virus has ever in reality been isolated, nor any disease provably linked to a virus, despite the medical industry’s extraordinarily vast claims about such entities, and hundreds of billions spent upon such research.⁶⁰

32. Indeed, we have a whole history of diseases which were labelled as viral at one point or another, but in each case studied were found to have been caused by nutritional deficiencies and/or industrial poisons, including the very foundational diseases pointed to by the medical establishment as the basis for viral theory.⁶¹

In following the SARS-CoV-2 covid hypothesis the global population has been subjected to mass medical misdiagnosis, mass medical experimentation, and mass medical murder. 

The sick and weak have been subjected to fatal forced ventilation writ large, widespread prescription of experimental drugs known to be fatally toxic and disease causing, the institutionalized prescription of simple symptom alleviators in dangerously toxic doses, the refusal from medical institutions to allow patients access to known, simple and effective treatments for symptoms, the refusal by hospitals and health care workers to treat patients in need of care for fear of contagion, and the widespread pressure from institutions to force the entire populace, sick or healthy, to experimental injections on themselves and their children that have matched suddenly skyrocketing cases of heart disease, infertility, cancers and mortality rates around the world. 

Meanwhile, the very real diseases that people are suffering from go misdiagnosed and mistreated. And our political voices stunted because no one can ask the simple question: why are people getting sick? What can we clean up in our environment? What can we improve in our nutrition?

Instead, the war on our bodies, the bodies of our children and those of our families continues unabated. In the claimed effort to destroy this theoretical entity, new poisons are rolled out daily, new genetic experiments are instituted en masse and all scientific common sense silenced or attacked. 

Instead of calling for an immediate end to this widespread delusion, the WHO, the CDC, and the many who follow these profoundly dangerous institutions have called constantly for new wars against supposed variants of SARS-CoV-2 or the claimed emergence of new “viruses” whose symptoms happen to match the very side effects of the previous round of vaccines. 

Just this past week, a number of doctors and scientists called for a series of experiments that would at the very least be a methodologically sound way of checking to see whether or not such a virus likely exists. However, rather than race to perform these experiments, scientific institutions seem far more hell-bent on following the billions of dollars in grant money that exist to those who create contorted and uncontrolled experiments to re-justify fear of the virus rather than doing the basic natural science that common sense demands.

Countless, doctors, nurses, scientists, journalists, activists, and laypeople have all spoken out, time and again, but their voices have been consistently ignored - drowned out by the media-magnified fear that the danger is ever present, ever increasing, and the next child must be laid upon the medical altar to be injected with the next experiment that will, this time, stop “the virus.” 

The case that no such covid-causing virus exists is overwhelming. The case for it is riddled with inconsistencies. Yet belief in this mass delusion has brought us past a medieval precipice and into a state of wholesale death, disease and destruction, silenced in the media, spoken of in hushed tones at hospitals, in private moments between families, as we watch our loved ones die, still clinging to absurd ideas, like passengers who threw themselves overboard in a fit of panic, drowning now, clutching for lifeboats that exist only in their media-fed and pharma-managed imagination, while the war on human health and sanity continues at an ever increasing pace, casting their hypnotized believers into the sea as they too suddenly develop blood clots, heart attacks and cancer and reach for the very toxic weights which poisoned them to stay afloat. 

When will we come to our senses?

Michael Wallach is the director and co-producer of the seven part documentary series “The Viral Delusion” found at www.theviraldelusion.com. He is a graduate of Cornell University with his MA from Columbia University, and a former Presidential Management Fellow and Analyst with the US Department of State. 

1.  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 

2.  https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 

3. https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-ventilator-deaths-new-york.html

4.   https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 

5.  Dr. Wu Zunyou, Chinese CDC, NBC Nightly News, Jan 2021 “They didn’t isolate the virus, that’s the issue”

6.  The Covid-19 Fraud and War On Humanity, Dr Mark Bailey and Dr John Bevan-Smith, Nov 2021

7.  https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

8.  “Exosomes and Viruses do not conform to strict definitions, making it almost impossible to classify these particles” Journal of General Virology, January 2019
 “It is almost impossible to distinguish extra-cellular vesicles from viruses and to separate them” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2016

9.  Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from the first patient 

diagnosed with COVID-19 in Australia, Leon Caly, et al. JMA 2020

10.  https://www.bitchute.com/video/rekrHZ52IKZy/

11.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34378952/

12.  Chu H, Chan JF-W, Yuen TT-T, et al. Comparative tropism, replication kinetics, and cell damage profiling of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV with implications for clinical manifestations, transmissibility, and laboratory studies of COVID-19: an observational study. The Lancet Microbe. 2020;1(1):e14-e23. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30004-5

13.  The Covid-19 Fraud and War On Humanity, Dr Mark Bailey and Dr John Bevan-Smith, Nov 2021

14.  “We examined the capacity of SARS-Cov-2 to replicate in human cell lines… No cytopathic effect was observed except in vero cells.” Isolation and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from the first US COVID-19 patient, Harcourt et al., March 2020, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.02.972935

15.  The Covid-19 Fraud and War On Humanity, Dr Mark Bailey and Dr John Bevan-Smith, Nov 2021

16.  Liu, Y. et al. Preprint at bioRxiv http://doi.org/dqts (2020).

17.   https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 

18.  The Covid-19 Fraud and War On Humanity, Dr Mark Bailey and Dr John Bevan-Smith, Nov 2021

19.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045

20.  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346483715_External_peer_review_of_the_RTPCR_test_to_detect_SARS-CoV-2_reveals_10_major_scientific_flaws_at_the_molecular_and_methodological_level_consequences_for_false_positive_results

21.  https://www.reuters.com/video/watch/idOVCCIUZCJ

22.  “Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory, David Crowe, June 2020

23.  “Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory, David Crowe, June 2020

24.  https://www.rt.com/op-ed/504625-covid19-flu-disappeared-replaced/

25.  https://fee.org/articles/physicians-say-hospitals-are-pressuring-er-docs-to-list-covid-19-on-death-certificates-here-s-why/

26.  https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200831/Majority-of-US-COVID-19-fatalities-had-underlying-medical-conditions.aspx

27.  Interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, The Viral Delusion Documentary Series

28.   Interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, The Viral Delusion Documentary Series

29.  Interview with Torsten Engelbrecht, The Viral Delusion Documentary Series

30. 10.1038/s41586-020-2312-y

31.  Interview with Stefano Scoglio, The Viral Delusion Documentary Series

32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00519-0

33.  “Remdesivir and interferon fall flat in WHO's megastudy of COVID-19 treatments” Science, Oct 2020

34.   (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0255540)

35.  Interview with Dr. Claus Kohnlein, The Viral Delusion Documentary Series

36.  https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=9&name=2020_06_02_all_cause_mortality_during_covid_19_no_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response

37.  https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=104&name=2021_08_06_analysis_of_all_cause_mortality_by_week_in_canada_2010_2021_by_province_age_and_sex_there_was_no_covid_19_pandemic_and_there_is_strong_evidence_of_response_caused_deaths_in_the_most_elderly_and_in_young_males

38.  https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2020/04/COVID2020.html

39.  https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5088/htm

40.  http://www.npc.gov.cn/englishnpc/c23934/202012/0b1fd779c29e49bd99eb0e65b66aa783.shtml

41.  https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2019-08-27/china-vaccine-law-passed/

42.  https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/11/bill-sardi/if-covid-19-isnt-killing-americans-what-is/

43. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34778597/

44.  https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/07/bill-sardi/red-blood-cells-of-long-haul-covid-19-patients-are-smaller-than-normal-explains-blood-clotting-risk/

45.  https://jennifermargulis.net/glyphosate-and-covid-19-connection/

46.  https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=9&name=2020_06_02_all_cause_mortality_during_covid_19_no_plague_and_a_likely_signature_of_mass_homicide_by_government_response

47. “Remdesivir and interferon fall flat in WHO's megastudy of COVID-19 treatments” Science, Oct 2020

48.  https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/humanitys-whistleblower-dr-robert-malone-sounds-the-alarm/article_e9c05e86-6ccf-11ec-9417-bbc21429de9c.html

49.  https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2020/08/swedsu.html

50.  https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2020/08/swedsu.html

51.  https://fee.org/articles/lockdowns-had-little-to-no-effect-on-covid-mortality-new-john-hopkins-study/

52.  https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=12&name=2020_12_28_measures_do_not_prevent_deaths_transmission_is_not_by_contact_masks_provide_no_benefit_vaccines_are_inherently_dangerous_review_update_of_recent_science_relevant_to_covid_19_policy

53.  https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=115&name=2022_07_09_evaluating_the_effect_of_lockdowns_on_all_cause_mortality_during_the_covid_era_lockdowns_did_not_save_lives

54.  https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=8&name=2020_04_11_masks_dont_work_a_review_of_science_relevant_to_covid_19_social_policy

55.  https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=8&name=2020_04_11_masks_dont_work_a_review_of_science_relevant_to_covid_19_social_policy

56.  https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-30-asymptomatic-transmission-of-covid-19-didnt-occur.html

57.  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/pandemic-vaccinated-latest-uk-health-data-shows-vaccinated-deaths-higher-unvaccinated-deaths-last-three-months/

58.  https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-10-vaccinated-children-higher-all-cause-death-rate.html

59.  https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/09/vasko-kohlmayer/the-vaccines-do-not-stop-severe-covid-or-death/

60.  https://viroliegy.com/2022/01/11/has-the-virus-been-isolated-no/

61.  Virus Mania: How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense, Torsten Engelbrecht, Claus Kohnlein, Sam Bailey, Stefano Scoglio